Learn about PSE
Electricity reaches homes, businesses and institutions through the distribution network fed from the transmission network we manage. We are the only electricity transmission system operator within the territory of Poland. We care about the reliability of electricity supply to all regions of the country.

We play a key role in the development of the Polish economy. We also ensure the secure and cost-effective operation of the Polish power system as part of the common European system.

Risk management

Risk management is an integral part of the operational and decision-making processes carried out in all areas of PSE's activities, including power system management, system development, ICT, operation or investment. When initiating and subsequently implementing activities in these and other business areas, account is taken of risks the materialisation of which could contribute to the failure to achieve the strategic and operational objectives pursued, including the ability of the organisation to ensure the operational continuity of both the national electricity system and the company itself. Risk management in each area involves the systematic application of planned and coordinated measures, procedures and practices that reduce or eliminate the possibility of risk materialisation, and minimise the negative effects of their occurrence or enable their positive effects to be utilised.
Risk management measures, undertaken at strategic and operational level, are aligned with the process of identifying, assessing and monitoring the risks most relevant to PSE. In accordance with the company's Risk Management Policy, this process covers the most important areas of PSE’s activities, including in particular ensuring the continuity of electricity supply, the provision of transmission services and the implementation of investment processes. In practice, the substantive scope of this process refers to all dimensions of the company's activities and is intended to adequately reflect the changing internal and external circumstances in the register of risks most relevant to PSE.
At PSE, as part of the continuous improvement of organisational, process and technological solutions, initiatives are undertaken aimed both at improving the operational efficiency and security of the PPS and the company, as well as reducing or managing risks more effectively. Their implementation is reflected in the risk parameters included in the register mentioned above.

Risk management and the parties involved

The following parties are involved in risk management activities, both those undertaken within the framework of operational and decision-making processes, as well as those being part of the process of identifying, assessing and monitoring the most significant risks from the point of view of PSE:
  • the Audit Committee/Supervisory Board,
  • the Management Board,
  • managers of the company’s organisational units,
  • risk coordinators in the company’s organisational units,
  • all employees of the company,
  • the Risk Management Office.
Presented below is essential information on the role of each of those parties.

Audit Committee/Supervisory Board
The Audit Committee supports the Supervisory Board in supervising the operation of risk identification and management systems.
In particular, the Audit Committee can:
  • assess the appropriateness of the business risk identification, monitoring and mitigation systems used by the Management Board,
  • assess the compliance of the internal control system with the internal rules and regulations and procedures that ensure the effective operation of the system,
  • indicate internal control system areas that need improvement,
  • assess the performance of systems reducing the risk of irregularities occurring in the company,
  • submit internal audit plan proposals for a particular year.
The Audit Committee may demand that the Management Board submit information on the approach to risk management, as well as risks relevant to the company and the PPS.
Management Board
The Management Board is responsible for the establishment of a system-based approach to risk management in the company. Approves the Risk Management Policy. In addition, the Management Board studies periodic reports on PSE’s business risks as well as measures taken as part of risk management.
Managers of the company’s organisational units
Each manager of the company’s organisational unit is responsible for the management of the business area assigned to that unit. Management activities include the identification of risks and the development and implementation of an approach to the management of risks that may affect the functioning of the area concerned and the achievement of its objectives.
In order to ensure terminological and methodological consistency in risk identification and assessment, and to ensure the adequate reflection of risks related to a given business area in register of risks of key significance for PSE, organisational unit managers cooperate with the Risk Management Office (RMO). The manager of an organisational unit acts as the risk owner for risks falling within their area of responsibility, which are included in the risk register.
Risk coordinators in the Company’s organisational units
Risk coordinators in the Company’s organisational units are individuals designated by the managers of those units. They are responsible for operational cooperation with the RMO, mainly for ensuring the current risk information flow between the unit concerned and the RMO. They support managers of organisational units in performing their role as risk owners.
All employees of the Company
PSE’s employees are a significant component of a system-based approach to risk management at the company – they engage in activities falling in line with the approach to the management of respective risks and support unit managers in the risk identification process. In addition, all employees are required to familiarise themselves with the Risk Management Policy and the risk management rules described in it.
Risk Management Office
The RMO is an organisational unit responsible for providing the Management Board with a comprehensive picture of the most significant risks for the operation of the PPS and the company. The unit ensures a system-based approach to the identification and assessment of those risks. In addition, the RMO develops recommendations for measures promoting risk management, pursued by the company’s individual organisational units (this applies to areas such as investment, ICT, anti-corruption, or employee health and safety). The Office ensures terminological and methodological consistency with regard to risk identification and assessment, as well as risk monitoring and reporting to the Management Board.

Risk management and objectives of the organisation

The operational security and efficiency of the PPS, and of the company itself, is ensured through the implementation and continuous maintenance of necessary systems and functions, including: risk management, internal control, compliance management, and internal audit. Their common assumption is to support the organisation in achieving the company’s operational and strategic objectives.
PSE’s strategy defines 6 main challenges and 17 objectives to be achieved within 10 years. The implementation of the objectives involves a number of risks. Therefore, it is of key importance for the company to ensure a system-based approach to the identification, assessment, management and monitoring of strategic as well as operational risks.
At the same time, risk management is treated at the company as an indispensable element within three independent but mutually complementary lines of defence.
First line of defence
It is provided by PSE’s organisational units which are risk owners and are responsible for their management. The first line of defence comprises management control solutions forming a set of supervisory and audit measures such as control mechanisms embedded in processes and systems. Their purpose is to reduce risks related to the different business areas of the company, as well as taking advantage of opportunities.
Druga linia obrony
It involves the organisational units performing supervisory and control tasks at the company, including units responsible for financial audit, physical and ICT security, risk management, regulatory compliance, and quality control. Activities pursued by these functions involve the monitoring and control of solutions deployed in the first line of defence, and supporting PSE organisational unit managers (risk owners) in order to ensure the correct design and efficient operation of implemented controls mechanisms.
Third line of defence
In includes the functions that provide the Management Board and the Supervisory Board with a guarantee in the form of independent assurance that the first and second lines of defence effectively support the achievement of the company’s strategic and operational objectives. At PSE, the third line of defence is delivered by the internal audit function performed by the Supervision Office.

Activities pursued as part of the risk identification, assessment and monitoring process

The process of identifying, assessing and monitoring the risks most relevant to the PPS and the company is coordinated by the Risk Management Office (RMO. The main activities pursued in the process include:
Risk identification
In coordination with risk owners, the RMO analyses changes in external and external conditions, as they can lead to the emergence of risks of a high significance for the company, which previously did not pose an obstacle to the fulfilment of its tasks. As part of risk identification, a description of the risk scenario is developed together with associated potential causes and effects. In addition, the main elements of the approach to risk management are indicated. Risk identification is performed both as part of annual risk reviews and ad hoc – risks can be identified in the course of a current analysis of PSE’s business conditions.
Risk assessment
Identified risks are subject to assessment which is also performed in coordination with risk owners and the RMO. Risk assessment is carried out in accordance with the specific methodological approach adopted by the company (see “Methodological approach adopted”).
Keeping and updating the risk register
Identified and assessed risks are recorded in the register of the company’s key risks. The register is kept by the RMO. The register reflects all changes in the value of each risk parameter. Updates are performed both as a result of the annual risk review and ad hoc, where this is justified by a change in conditions, including risk data obtained from the company’s different business areas.
Key Risk Indicators
For the purposes of risk monitoring, Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) are defined. The character and design of each KRI are determined in coordination with the owner of the risk to be monitored with the use of the indicator. Data that allow changes in the indicator value and related trends to be traced are acquired cyclically, at the intervals adopted. Information on the KRO values is used in analysing the conditions related to each risk. They are also taken into account in reporting to the Management Board on the risks included in the company’s risk register.
Approach to management – initiatives supporting risk management
The approach to risk management is defined by the risk owner. Irrespective of permanent, predefined components of the approach, in many cases initiatives are undertaken which are aimed at supplementing or modifying previously adopted solutions so as to improve the quality of risk management or reduce the probability of a specific risk scenario occurring. The initiatives, including their implementation progress, are subject to periodic monitoring.
Reporting
Findings of the analyses of external and internal conditions affecting the risk measures, changes in KRI values, progress in implementing initiatives supporting risk management and recommendations resulting from monitoring performed by the RMO are reported to the Management Board on a periodic basis. Annual and quarterly reports are submitted to the Management Board. Moreover, in the event of changes in the risk register, reported during specific quarters, ad hoc reports are drafted, containing information on such changes and their reasons.

The methodological approach adopted

The company follows the Methodology for Risk Assessment at PSE S.A. and its subsidiaries, which defines the methodological approach used in assessing identified risks of key significance for the PPS and the company. The document is subject to periodic reviews and updates. It is the company’s intention to ensure that the approach presented in the document takes into account the experience gained in the course of its application and reflects the current level of methodological development and advancement.
The methodology and the associated toolbox support activities aimed at:
  • identifying key risks related to the functioning of the organisation – including in particular those related to operation, maintenance and investment activities
  • assessing, quantifying and ranking of identified risks,
  • determining the correlations between identified risks and their significance for the measure of individual risks,
  • enabling the current monitoring of risks, including risk value trends, and generating synthetic management information on risks.
The basic risk measure is the product of:
  • the expected frequency of materialisation of a particular risk in a year, taking into account the susceptibility (conditional probability of risk materialisation in case of occurrence of individual causes),
  • the total value of the direct and indirect effects of its materialisation, weighted by resilience (conditional probability of effects occurring following the materialisation of a particular risk).
It was also assumed that the materialisation of one risk may be a trigger (cause) of the emergence of other risks. In such cases, cascades of risks are identified and taken into account in estimating risk measures:
  • the measure of the upstream risk as a potential cause of the materialisation of the downstream risk takes into account the indirect effect (the effect of the materialisation of the downstream risk, adjusted by the conditional probability with which the upstream risk leads to the materialisation of the downstream risk.
For each risk, its causes, incidence, conditional probability and effects are defined:
  • in relation to the cause, i.e. specific event (or circumstance) the occurrence of which may lead to risk materialisation, the incidence and conditional probability of risk materialisation after the occurrence of such cause (susceptibility) is determined;
  • the incidence of causes, susceptibility and resilience are determined using a scale (see below) or by providing a specific numerical value,
  • the effects understood as any (negative and positive) consequences of risk materialisation are determined by a numerical value or descriptively, using the following ratings on a descriptive scale: critical, serious, moderate, low, insignificant,
  • as part of the 5 dimensions of effect (financial and material, continuity and quality of the PPS operations, image and legal issues, impact on health and life, environmental impact), a qualitative description of the effect to which a given value is assigned is formulated with the use of scales,
  • not all effect dimensions are expressed in monetary form – therefore their measures are converted into PLN with the use of monetary conversion rates defined further on in the methodology.
Risk parameters (incidence, susceptibility, resilience, effect) are subject to expert assessment or they are assessed with the use of dedicated area-specific methodologies (if developed).
GRI 102-15

Company Risk Register – selected substantial risks

Presented below is a summary of selected risks included in the Company Risk Register. For each of them, significant elements of the approach to management adopted are indicated.
Having regard to the epidemic conditions that have recently developed – the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic – the description of the approach to management has been supplemented with information on measures and solutions that additionally apply to particular risks.
Table – Selected substantial risks
Extensive system failure (partial or total blackout) leading to complete halt or limitation of electricity supply to customers
Approach to risk management – main assumptions Additional measures/solutions applied in connection with the
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
    • ongoing monitoring of the level of compliance with network operation security criteria
    • ongoing elimination of risks by changing the distribution of generation within the PPS
    • coordination of network outage scheduling
    • obtaining, under emergency supply agreements, assistance from neighbouring transmission system operators
    • installation and operation of automatic load shedding systems
    • KDM dispatcher training system (with the use of the PPS simulator)
    • maintaining standby KDM and ODM centres
    • the development and implementation of tools supporting the management of the unavailability of power system elements – the Outage Management System (SPSM/OMS) based on a centrally managed grid model (implementation phase)
  • restrictive precautions are in force at PSE facilities to prevent the virus infection: mutual locational separation between key teams in each organisational unit, segmentation of buildings accommodating critical workplaces – the KDM, ODM and RCN centres, as well as key staff responsible for cybersecurity and operation of the communications network
  • the necessary redundancy is maintained of workforce/teams directly involved in the current management of the transmission system
Imposition of power rationing levels due to long-lasting capacity shortfall in the PPS
Approach to risk management – main assumptions Additional measures/solutions applied in connection with the
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  • conclusion and performance of DSR service agreements and the reliability-must-run service agreements with nJWCD units
  • obtaining, under emergency supply agreements, assistance from neighbouring transmission system operators
  • coordination with generators of repair schedules for generating units
  • implementation of the capacity market, including the conclusion of capacity agreements with generating units
  • implementation of a dedicated IT platform supporting the functioning of the capacity market (implementation phase)
  • implementation of software for the calculation of the required stochastic capacity reserve (SRM – Stochastyczna Rezerwa Mocy) and performing the short-term generation adequacy (STA – Short Term Adequacy) analysis (implementation phase)
  • the following measures have been taken relating to PSE’s own resources necessary for the management of processes which are important in terms of risk management: (i) employees have been instructed to work from home, (ii) the use of tools for remote group work has been increased, (iii) the methods of access to IT systems dedicated to the operation of the capacity market have been adapted to remote operation
Long-term inability to evacuate power from JWCD units for network reasons
Approach to risk management – main assumptions Additional measures/solutions applied in connection with the
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  • ensuring the undisturbed operation of network infrastructure through systematically undertaken maintenance actions and immediate failure repair (PSE’s own maintenance teams and maintenance contracts with specialised third-party service providers, preventive replacement of depreciated grid assets, maintenance of stock at the standard levels adopted)
  • planning and implementation of investment projects – construction and upgrading of power lines and electrical substations (a unit dedicated to the implementation of investment projects, a standardised project implementation and monitoring, planning and execution of outages of PPS elements for investment project purposes)
  • the rules for the separation of teams/groups of employees responsible for operation and maintenance (the “iron 3 & 4” have been separated, employee turnover introduced – base location, standby location and availability/work from home) while preserving the executive capabilities of teams
  • an additional sanitary regime has been put in place (including preventive measures minimising the risk of malfunction of the fault and failure elimination process adopted)
  • facilities/rooms have been designated to provide accommodation to employee teams/groups in the event the need arises for total isolation of critical centres, i.e. RCN, ZES (they have been equipped with essential food packages, hygiene and sanitary supplies, personal protection equipment, items necessary for long-term accommodation, including leisure facilities)
  • a personal protection equipment standard has been prepared; personal protection equipment is replenished on an ongoing basis and maintained at the required levels
  • guidelines have been introduced for CJI employees, i.e. Project Team Members and employees of third-party service providers performing work for PSE such as (i) strict control of personnel authorised to enter and move about the facility, (ii) obligatory temperature measurement and distancing, (iii) ban on direct contact between PSE CIU employees and employees of third-party providers, minimisation/ elimination of situations where work is performed by third-party personnel in rooms where ZES employees are present (including members of Project Teams), provision of personal protection equipment to both PSE and third-party personnel
  • some of PSE CJI employees have been delegated to work from home or have been put on standstill
  • a total ban has been imposed on movement between locations, foreign business travel, e.g. to participate in FAT procedures (the tests are carried out remotely with online monitoring capability)
  • contractors working with PSE CJU have put into effect their own work procedures and guidelines with a view to reducing the spread of the pandemic
  • communication with the use of IT tools (mainly Skype) has been put in place on a wider basis for the organisation of internal meetings at PSE and external meetings with contractors and subcontractors
Loss of the ability of current management of the PPS
Approach to risk management – main assumptions Additional measures/solutions applied in connection with the
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  • ICT infrastructure supporting the operation of high-availability/ high criticality systems is designed and deployed with a hardware and logical redundancy, and strictly technological processes are monitored on an ongoing basis
  • periodic technical checks/ inspections are carried out
  • procedures have been established to maintain business continuity in the event of loss of selected solutions forming the PPS management system (check tests are performed)
  • monitoring planned departures of key personnel in the system management area, HR activities, including development and educational actions with a view to ensuring competence continuity for the correct control of the PPS
  • restrictive precautions are in force at PSE facilities to prevent the virus infection: mutual locational separation between key teams in each organisational unit, segmentation of buildings accommodating critical workplaces – the KDM, ODM and RCN centres, as well as key staff responsible for cybersecurity and operation of the communications network
  • the necessary redundancy is maintained of workforce/teams directly involved in the current management of the transmission system
Effective cyberattack on key/critical systems
Approach to risk management – main assumptions Additional measures/solutions applied in connection with the
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  • the ICT Strategy has been developed and is implemented (with the strongest emphasis placed on ICT security)
  • a number of technical and organisational solutions based on good practices in cybersecurity are in place, improving security and preventing cyberattacks
  • continuous risk monitoring is performed (the dedicated unit called PSE SOC (Security Operation Centre) has been set up for the purpose)
  • thanks to previously developed security solutions, the company, having identified COVID-19 pandemic risks and having taken the business decision to delegate a significant number of employees to work from home, was able carry out the process in a secure manner and within a relatively short time period. This activity was prepared and carried out by the ICT Department by ensuring appropriate infrastructure and contractual securing of services for remote work
  • in accordance with the guidelines adopted by the company, most of the department’s employees, like other departments, are now working from home, and only indispensable resources work on site, at the company’s headquarters, meeting relevant safety precautions (work in dedicated rooms, following distancing rules, with the use of protection equipment)
  • in addition, the ICT Department has taken steps to provide adequate human resources for the operation critical systems of key importance for PSE, as reported in the previous quarters in quarterly risk management reports; for key resources and those working at the company’s headquarters, appropriate replacements are available in the event of illness
Loss of the ability to use PSE’s key/critical IT systems
Approach to risk management – main assumptions Additional measures/solutions applied in connection with the
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  • ICT infrastructure supporting the operation of high-availability/ high criticality systems is designed and deployed with a hardware and logical redundancy
  • industrial processes using ICT infrastructure are monitored on an ongoing basis
  • a dedicated training system is in place for employees responsible for the operation of ICT systems
  • procedures have been established to maintain business continuity in the event of loss of selected solutions forming the PPS management system (check tests are performed)
  • thanks to previously developed security solutions, the company, having identified COVID-19 pandemic risks and having taken the business decision to delegate a significant number of employees to work from home, was able carry out the process in a secure manner and within a relatively short time period. This activity was prepared and carried out by the ICT Department by ensuring appropriate infrastructure and contractual securing of services for remote work
  • in accordance with the guidelines adopted by the company, most of the department’s employees, like other departments, are now working from home, and only indispensable resources work on site, at the company’s headquarters, meeting relevant safety precautions (work in dedicated rooms, following distancing rules, with the use of protection equipment)
  • in addition, the ICT Department has taken steps to provide adequate human resources for the operation critical systems of key importance for PSE, as reported in the previous quarters in quarterly risk management reports; for key resources and those working at the Company’s headquarters, appropriate replacements are available in the event of illness
The risk of generation inadequacy
Approach to risk management – main assumptions Additional measures/solutions applied in connection with the
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  • the possibility to use ad hoc remedial actions improving the power balance in the PPS remains available (DSR agreements, reliability-must-run (RMR) agreements, TSO emergency import service under agreements with neighbouring transmission system operators)
  • coordinating repair plans JWCD units, including the introduction of changes to improve the power balance in the PPS
  • monitoring the utilisation of operating hours of generating units covered by the natural derogation for 17,500h under the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED)
  • implementation of the capacity market, including the conclusion of capacity agreements with generating units, implementation of a dedicated IT platform supporting the functioning of the capacity market (implementation phase)
  • the following measures have been taken relating to PSE’s own resources necessary for the management of processes which are important in terms of risk management: (i) employees have been instructed to work from home, (ii) the use of tools for remote group work (Skype, Confluence, Jira) has been increased, (iii) the methods of access to IT systems dedicated to the operation of the capacity market have been adapted to remote operation
Failure to implement on time key projects for power evacuation/improvement of power supply conditions
Approach to risk management – main assumptions Additional measures/solutions applied in connection with the
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  • planning and implementation of investment projects – construction and upgrading of power lines and electrical substations (a unit dedicated to the implementation of investment projects, a standardised project implementation and monitoring, planning and execution of outages of PPS elements for investment project purposes)
  • guidelines have been introduced for CJI employees, i.e. Project Team Members and employees of third-party service providers performing work for PSE such as (i) strict control of personnel authorised to enter and move about the facility, (ii) obligatory temperature measurement and distancing, (iii) ban on direct contact between PSE CIU employees and employees of third-party providers, minimisation/ elimination of situations where work is performed by third-party personnel in rooms where ZES employees are present (including members of Project Teams), provision of personal protection equipment to both PSE and third-party personnel
  • some of PSE CJI employees have been delegated to work from home or have been put on standstill
  • a total ban has been imposed on movement between locations, foreign business travel, e.g. to participate in FAT procedures (the tests are carried out remotely with online monitoring capability)
  • contractors working with PSE CJU have put into effect their own work procedures and guidelines with a view to reducing the spread of the pandemic
  • communication with the use of IT tools (mainly Skype) has been put in place on a wider basis for the organisation of internal meetings at PSE and external meetings with contractors and subcontractors
Social conflicts that make it impossible to undertake key investments or impede timely completion
Approach to risk management – main assumptions Additional measures/solutions applied in connection with the
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  • selection of the optimal routes and locations of network investment projects with a view to reducing the risk of social conflicts (coordination with local communities)
  • development and implementation of public communication programmes at the level of individual projects (including the dialogue with stakeholders)
  • supervision over communication activities carried out by project contractors
  • existing videoconferencing platforms (e.g. Skype and ClickMeeting) are used widely in communication with local authorities
  • the geosurvey (a web tool that allows detailed lines routes to be viewed on satellite maps, distances from designated points to be checked, and comments to be submitted) has been deployed for communication with local communities
  • cooperation with local media has been intensified in areas in which the company has been carrying on or is planning investment projects (publication of information and educational materials, information campaign on the implementation of the geosurvey)
  • support mechanisms have been launched for PSE’s social partners – local governments and public benefit institutions (PSE has purchased and donated to them personal protection equipment; in cooperation with the Ministry of State Assets and the Ministry of Health, PSE has made monetary and in-kind donations to hospitals; under the #GratefulToMedics (#WdzięczniMedykom) campaign, PSE has been partnering with Caritas Poland)
  • the rules of the 2nd edition of the social initiative “EmPower Your Environment”, which has taken the form of an all-year grant scheme this year due to the ongoing pandemic, have been modified and one of the main categories under which support can be sought is now health and medical care, in particular measures to combat the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (support is available to selected communes and their organisational units, e.g. schools, kindergartens or social welfare centres, as well as non-governmental organisations)
Damage to a critical substation asset
Approach to risk management – main assumptions Additional measures/solutions applied in connection with the
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  • periodic assessments of the condition of substation equipment are carried out
  • preventive replacements of the most depreciated and oldest grid assets are performed
  • substation O&M work is carried out by employees with experience and competence necessary for the secure and correct performance of operation and maintenance procedures
  • necessary physical security and access control solutions will be deployed at substation facilities
  • the rules for the separation of teams/groups of employees responsible for operation and maintenance (the “iron 3 & 4” have been separated, employee turnover introduced – base location, standby location and availability/work from home) while preserving the executive capabilities of teams
  • an additional sanitary regime has been put in place (including preventive measures minimising the risk of malfunction of the fault and failure elimination process adopted)
  • facilities/rooms have been designated to provide accommodation to employee teams/groups in the event the need arises for total isolation of critical centres, i.e. RCN, ZES (they have been equipped with essential food packages, hygiene and sanitary supplies, personal protection equipment, items necessary for long-term accommodation, including leisure facilities)
  • a personal protection equipment standard has been prepared; personal protection equipment is replenished on an ongoing basis and maintained at the required levels
Damage to a critical line asset
Approach to risk management – main assumptions Additional measures/solutions applied in connection with the
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  • periodic assessments of the condition of line infrastructure components substation equipment are carried out
  • preventive replacements of the most depreciated and oldest grid assets are performed
    • the rules for the separation of teams/groups of employees responsible for operation and maintenance (the “iron 3 & 4” have been separated, employee turnover introduced – base location, standby location and availability/work from home) while preserving the executive capabilities of teams
    • an additional sanitary regime has been put in place (including preventive measures minimising the risk of malfunction of the fault and failure elimination process adopted)
    • facilities/rooms have been designated to provide accommodation to employee teams/groups in the event the need arises for total isolation of critical centres, i.e. RCN and ZES (they have been equipped with essential food packages, hygiene and sanitary supplies, personal protection equipment, items necessary for long-term accommodation, including leisure facilities)
    • a personal protection equipment standard has been prepared; personal protection equipment is replenished on an ongoing basis and maintained at the required levels

Selected examples

SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
PSE participates in the work of the Team for Monitoring Security Risks reporting to the Minister of Climate, including the Sectoral Team for Electricity operating of part of it.
In addition, business continuity prevention procedures are implemented, and a Crisis Team set up by PSE at the end of January 2020, working in coordination with the Management Board, has been monitoring the spread of the virus on an ongoing basis and taking necessary actions as the situation requires, such as:
  • analyses of the pandemic development and its consequences for the company have been conducted, and recommendations are drawn up on measures necessary to ensure business continuity of the company and an undisturbed operation of the PPS,
  • restrictive precautions are in force at PSE facilities to prevent the virus infection: mutual locational separation between key teams in each organisational unit, segmentation of buildings accommodating critical workplaces – the National Power Dispatch Centre, Area Power Dispatch Centres and Regional Supervision Centres, as well as key staff responsible for cybersecurity and operation of the communications network,
  • restrictive precautions are in force at PSE facilities to prevent the virus infection: mutual locational separation between key teams in each organisational unit, segmentation of buildings accommodating critical workplaces – the National Power Dispatch Centre, Area Power Dispatch Centres and Regional Supervision Centres, as well as key staff responsible for cybersecurity and operation of the communications network,
Other solutions have also been put in place in response to the pandemic, including:
  • the possibility to submit applications for transmission network connection conditions electronically,
  • drones for aerial inspection of power lines have been deployed on a wider scale,
  • as part of the projects which have to be carried on due to their importance for Poland’s energy security, a pilot geosurvey has been conducted (an interactive application that allows a proposed location to be learnt and change proposals to be submitted – the solution was intended to enable and facilitate communication with stakeholders).
More information on the measures taken in connection with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic can be found in the table presenting selected risks and the approach adopted to manage those risks.
The further functioning of the organisational and procedural arrangements implemented or their tightening or relaxation is dependent on the development of the epidemic situation in the country and worldwide. Decisions will be taken having regard to personnel health and safety and operational continuity of the company and the PPS.
Regional and national electricity crises
Irrespective of ongoing activities pursued by the company as part pf risk management, PSE is involved in performing tasks aimed at the correct and timely implementation of the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2019/941 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on risk-preparedness in the electricity sector and repealing Directive 2005/89/EC.
The objective of the above regulation is to initiate, and then implement, measures with a view to preventing, preparing for and managing electricity crises in a spirit of solidarity and transparency and in full regard for the requirements of a competitive internal market for electricity. ‘The Regulation defines the electricity crisis as a present or imminent situation in which there is a significant electricity shortage, as determined by the Member States and described in their risk-preparedness plans, or in which it is impossible to supply electricity to customers.
The above regulation provides for:
  • defining regional electricity crisis scenarios,
  • drafting national electricity crisis scenarios,
  • developing risk-preparedness plans,
  • performing periodic risk-preparedness plan effectiveness tests and electricity crisis simulations,
  • drafting early warnings of the risk of a crisis occurring in a Member State and declaring an electricity crisis,
  • implementation of measures set out in risk-preparedness plans,
  • preparing ex post evaluation reports drawn up in each case after the end of an electricity crisis.
In order to ensure the performance of PSE’s tasks resulting from the above regulations, the Task Force for the performance of tasks resulting from Regulation 2019/941 relating to risk-preparedness plans (hereinafter: “Task Force”) was established on 28 January 2020 by Order of the President of the Management Board. In the course of its work so far, the Task Force has selected electricity crisis scenario proposals and submitted them to ENTSO-E (after having obtained the acceptance of the Management Board and the Competent Authority – the Minister of Climate). Based on the proposals submitted by Poland and other countries, ENTSO-E has defined 31 regional electricity crisis scenarios which can be assigned to several categories:
The Task Force assessed the aforementioned scenarios and submitted them to ENTSO-E (after having obtained the acceptance of the Management Board and the Competent Authority).
Further work, for which the Competent Authority will be responsible, includes:
  • the development of national electricity crisis scenarios – by 5 January 2021,
  • the development of risk-preparedness plans for individual scenarios – by 5 January 2022.
PSE will be engaged in the performance of those tasks in line with its competences and responsibilities arising from the role of transmission system operator in Poland.